NB&A Investigates Claims Against Oreck Halo and ProShieldNB&A Investigates Claims Against Oreck Halo and ProShield



Investigates Claims

The Oreck Corporation advertised its Halo vacuum cleaner and ProShield Plus air cleaner as having health benefits, allergy prevention and germ killing properties. During the 2009 holiday season, Oreck began advertising the pair of appliances together under the headline “Introducing the Oreck Flu Fighters.” The ads claimed that the vacuum and air cleaner would “help reduce the flu on virtually any surface and in the air in your home.” The vacuum sold for $600 and the air cleaner for $400.The Federal Trade Commission recently fined Oreck for misleading advertising on those points, however. Oreck agreed to stop making “allegedly false and unproven claims” about the products and agreed to pay a $750,000.00 fine. The consumer protection lawyers at Neblett, Beard and Arsenault are investigating complaints about the Oreck Halo vaccum cleaner and ProShield Plus air cleaner system.

Lafayette Plane Crash Kills 3, Injures 2Lafayette Plane Crash Kills 3, Injures 2



Lafayette Plane Crash Kills 3, Injures 2

Officials are investigating the cause of a Saturday afternoon plane crash that killed 3 people and seriously injured 2 more. According to the FAA, witnesses reported seeing the Cessna 182 take off from LeGros Memorial Airport in Estherwood, near Lafayette, Louisiana before it touched down and burst into flames. 4 of the victims are from Louisiana, the other is from Texas.

The cause of the crash in under investigation by the National Transportation Safety Board, FAA and Acadia Parish Sheriff’s Office.

Now is the Time to Change the LawNow is the Time to Change the Law



Time to Change the Law

The law ought to be fair, consistent, and up to date. It ought to make people whole for their losses and compensate them for the real damage they suffer. Now, in wrongful death cases on the high seas, it does none of those things but the U.S. Senate currently has a chance to fix this defect and it is time to do so.

11 men died in the initial explosion on the Deepwater Horizon. Their survivors have appeared before several Congressional committees and explained why the law today is unfair. It is unjust because neither the Jones Act nor the Death on the High Seas Act (DOHSA) – the maritime statutes that define survivors’ rights in the Deepwater Horizon tragedy-provide “loss of society” damages to compensate for the lost comfort, care and companionship of their deceased loved ones. The majority of American jurisdictions today do recognize these rights in wrongful death cases, but not under these maritime laws, both passed in 1920.

All of the survivors-two wives, a father, and a brother–eloquently described the terrible emotional loss they have suffered and the devastating effects of the deaths of their loved ones on the children of the deceased workers. Yet today, none of those very real emotional damages are recoverable under the applicable law. All that is recoverable is purely economic damage, such as loss of support, loss of services, and funeral expenses. But, the law treats the relationship itself—the essence of the connection between people—as worthless. In terms of the love and care lost, the lost life is treated as if it has no value. That fact is morally offensive and logically incoherent. Loss of society damages are, as noted, available in most tort cases on land and are available for the survivors of those killed in high season commercial aviation disasters. The law should be the same for all and it is time to make it so.

Time to Change the Law

President Obama has met with some of the survivors and pledged his support, and Congress has held hearings to discern whether current laws adequately protect the victims of this catastrophe. On July, the House passed a bill, Rep. Conyers’ H.R. 5503, that would allow the survivors of someone killed on the high seas to recover loss of society damages. Now, the Senate can and should do the same thing. Legislation is already pending in the Senate that would implement the necessary change, Senator Patrick Leahy’s S. 3463. It is time to pass that law.

I have been honored to have appeared with the survivors before the U.S. House and Senate Judicial Committees and the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. No one at those hearings spoke against the changes described above. Now, I have heard that there are companies who claim that allowing recovery of loss of society damages might increase the cost of doing business for some. If this change in the law would now force maritime actors to have to consider the real emotional costs of deaths they cause, so be it. Perhaps if they were forced to do so, the world would be a safer place and none of this would ever have happened.